Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
Faraday Future Inks Battery Pact With LG Chem For Mystery Electric Car[2016/10/04]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]